Sounds&Words

A Song About Drugs or Alcohol

30-day Challenge, Day 8

Slobberbone: Pinball Song

Brent Best is Slobberbone’s lead singer and songwriter. (if that makes him the “head Boner,” I’m sure he’d like that title.) He has an amazing way with words, often constructing hilarious metaphors for the tribulations of everybody’s life. (”Gimme Back My Dog” is worth seeking out.) Among his finest songs — and there are so many fine songs — is perhaps the greatest break-up song ever written (“Wonderous Life”), one of the funniest songs ever about frat party hookups (“Whiskey Glass Eye”), and this little ditty about everything that goes wrong between boys and girls when too much alcohol is involved. It even contains my wife’s favorite line: “I saw that girl you used to know, at the other end of the bar / I never thought she’d ever get that far.”

I saw Slobberbone only once, back in about 1998, and they were among the loudest, most raucous bands I know, no small feat given that they were essentially just a country band on steroids. As one of my college friends would say, there's country-punk and country-PUNK! These guys are the latter, and just fking great in every way.

A Song to Drive To

30-day Challenge, Day 7

Jimmy LaFave: The Great Night

To me, a great driving song has a loping pace — urgent, but no emergency, an analog of the engine ahead of us propelling us somewhere, or maybe nowhere at all. (Not all who wander are lost, after all.)

My friend Brooks turned me on to Jimmy LaFave about 20 years ago, and this album, aptly titled Road Novel, kept me company on many drives. “The Great Night” is its last tune, and it keeps moving “into the closing of the day.” This is Americana with the tint of Springsteen (who admired LaFave), and the studied thoughtfulness of an old and wise soul.

There were other songs I had in mind for this day's description, but LaFave died about six weeks ago, making this selection a little bittersweet for me. He was a great, underrated songwriter (I see a pattern emerging here), and this tune is a great invocation to travel, to wander, to explore this amazing country without arrogance, superiority, or patriotism — but with wide eyes and a willing spirit.

There are many reasons to ramble 'cross this land
Do not make excuses, see it while you can
North, south, east, and west
Let the four winds blow
Their sweet breath upon your soul

There is no destination for those who like to roam
Restless through the night, following the song
In America, with grace and liberty
May your spirit always be

A song that makes you want to dance

30-Day Challenge, Day 6

Paul Cebar and the Milwaukeeans: Slither Awhile / Jump in the Line

Paul Cebar is a dedicated soul singer who owns over 10,000 soul LPs and a gift for fantastically slithery songs; he’s one of the greatest songwriters nobody’s heard of. He’s fronted several bands consumed with soul music, both originals and covers.

”Slither Awhile,” an original, was a common set opener way back when Cebar foil Robyn Pluer also sang in the band and there were two sax players. I loved Paul and Robyn’s harmonies and shared Robyn’s affection for obscure, major-key R&B covers.

“Jump in the Line" is, of all things, a Harry Belafonte (!) cover from one of the Sixties’ best-selling live LPs, Belafonte at Carnegie Hall. The sync on this video is off, but just listen to the joy in this tune, especially to the killer guitar solo by virtuoso Robby Gjersoe.

No matter who was in the band, Cebar was always a rollicking good time. In the early 1990s, when I was hurting and needed an emotional home, I saw Paul’s bands two or three times a month, with friends or alone, just to recharge my head. He played my friend Paul’s wedding in 1992 and mine in 1996.

Cebar’s career always seems to be on the verge of taking off, but a label folds or a band member departs, and it’s back to the beginning, proof that luck does not always favor the prepared, as karma does not always reward the deserving. I love Paul’s musicianship and admire his ability not to be put down by circumstance or bad luck. And he couldn’t be a nicer guy. I am sure he occupies a bigger place in my life than he can imagine.

The album you want is Upstroke for the Downfolk. If you don't want to dance to these tunes, I’m not sure I help you.

A song that reminds you of someone you’d rather forget

30-day Challenge, Day 4

Leonard Cohen: Alexandra Leaving

There aren’t people in my life I’d rather forget. Oh, sure, there are people who have done me wrong and experiences I regret and wish I could do over, but as Mandela said, “I never lose. I either win — or I learn.”

So it goes. I’ve tried to memorialize each person who has left a strong and distasteful mark on my life by keeping him or her as a lesson to remember and improve. This is one of those.

My favorite Leonard Cohen song is “Alexandra Leaving.”

For me, Cohen’s music holds two great themes: the merging of earthly and spiritual love, and the embrace of mystery. Those two themes merge in “Alexandra Leaving,” perhaps more than in any other of Cohen’s lyrics, and the lyric speaks to the kind of pain most of us have experienced when a great love comes to an end. I began writing this piece below by way of a conversation with a friend, and finished it, perhaps hastily, for this challenge. It doesn’t answer the question completely, but I think it’s close enough to what I mean.

The Annotated “Alexandra Leaving”

The lyrics of “Alexandra Leaving” are based on “The God Abandons Antony,” by the Greek poet Constantine Cavafy. (More information about the original can be found by a simple online search.) There is thus a temptation to think Cohen’s lyrics must address the same topic, i.e., that of departing Alexandria, Egypt — or at least something closely related to it.

I don’t think that’s right. Cohen was a master at seeing and creating layers of meaning, and I think the idea of “leaving Alexandria,” as it were, did not impel Cohen to set that same topic to song, but rather suggested another subject and another angle for his own well documented and long-explored themes.

In that sense, I think Cohen’s discovery of Cavafy’s poem catalyzed the sentiments in “Alexandra Leaving.” But given the originality of Cohen’s lyrical voice, I think it’s more likely that Cohen’s lyrics were motivated by Cavafy’s original, not derivative of it.

The first theme in Cohen’s work is the merging of human love and spirituality, and the impossibility of separating the two. Or, in fewer words, he explored the idea that “God is love.” In many of his best-known songs Cohen intentionally blends the love of a woman — either an actual woman from his life (“So Long, Marianne,” “Suzanne”) or a character (the unnamed woman from the fourth verse of “Hallelujah”) who represents women but who is not a specific woman — with love for God.

The second theme regards acceptance of the world’s mysteries. As a Jew and a Buddhist, Cohen certainly knew that there are phenomena we cannot explain. Some of us may call that “God’s will,” but most of us, even believers, doubt that a single entity manipulates the world with something like puppet-strings. Like the Buddha, Cohen challenges us to embrace life’s mysteries — to spend spiritual energy understanding and making peace with them — rather than resenting the universe or shaking our fists at God for placing before us questions we cannot answer.

In “Alexandra Leaving,” Cohen achieves perhaps his greatest synergy of these two themes. The song’s topic is simple enough — the end of love — but in it he (and Sharon Robinson, his co-writer) challenge us to accept the departure as a part of the human spiritual experience.

What follows is my own deconstruction of the lyric. I stake no claim to any exclusive understanding of Cohen; I am only saying that this is how the song strikes me, and the sense I make of it.

Suddenly the night has grown colder
The god of love preparing to depart

The metaphor of a cold night represents love’s departure. (It puts me in mind of the Robert Hunter line, “Summer flies and August dies, and the world grows dark and mean.” “The Days Between,” the song in which that lyric appears, isn’t based on a specific poem, though Hunter’s four verses of 14 lines each do approximate sonnet form.)

Cohen’s phrase, “the god of love,” is intriguing here, since he often merges the ideas of god and love, rather than talking about a single god of love among many gods (like Aphrodite among the Greek gods, for example). Instead, “the god of love” suggests a way of giving love its own spirit, so that love isn’t just a concept, but an actual living thing born of the spirituality in all of us, and thus literally an “animate object.” In the lyric, the god of love and Alexandra become one and the same, with Alexandra giving to love the form of a woman, and the god of love infusing Alexandra with those qualities — wisdom, beauty, energy, spiritual alignment — that make her the lover of the song’s listener.

Alexandra hoisted on his shoulder

The listener is aware of Alexandra’s turning away from him; their love is dying. It appears that the god of love has “stolen” Alexandra, but he hasn’t — see further.

They slip between the sentries of the heart

A recurring theme in the song, Cohen reminds the listener that this did not happen suddenly; we saw it coming. Our heart wants to hold the love that is escaping, but the guardians (the sentries of the heart) are powerless to stop it. Alexandra, and love, slip through the mechanisms of our self-protection.

I think it’s important that “depart” doesn’t necessarily mean “physically.” Given the repeated line later about Alexandra’s sleeping “on your satin,” I think Alexandra remains at least temporarily in the same space as the listener, even after their love has run its course. As he often does, Cohen leaves the question unanswered.

Upheld by the simplicities of pleasure
They gain the light, they formlessly entwine

The “simplicities of pleasure” is a clear reference to sex — the idea that we can be fooled into believing that love remains because physical intimacy continues. When we’re involved in sex, the person and the love become one — “they formlessly entwine.”

And radiant beyond your widest measure
They fall among the voices and the wine

It’s still radiant. Sex with a former love can ignite all kinds of wonder and remind us of the power of mystery — but when it’s over, Alexandra and love simply recede, falling among the other voices in the listener’s life and the wine that was almost good enough itself to reignite the love.

It's not a trick, your senses all deceiving
A fitful dream, the morning will exhaust

The promised intimacy of sexual love isn’t “fake.” It’s just what it is, no more and no less, and that doesn’t make it less real or less powerful. We weren’t deceived into believing it was real — it was real. But just because it was real doesn’t mean love isn’t fleeting. Love may depart, but the mysteries of love remain.

Say goodbye to Alexandra leaving
Then say goodbye to Alexandra lost

When you wake, you’ll know again that Alexandra’s love is leaving, and that she’s lost too. Alexandra’s love and Alexandra are “formlessly entwined,” one and the same.

Even though she sleeps upon your satin
Even though she wakes you with a kiss

There are measures of intimacy that remain, including the sexual love from last night and many nights past. She still sleeps next to you, she still wakes you with a kiss, she still cares for you and you for her.

Do not say the moment was imagined
Do not stoop to strategies like this

This is an essential part of the mystery in the song. When a love has left, it’s tempting to imagine that it wasn’t really love. (See also Eric Andersen’s plaintive “Is It Really Love at All?” — “Love, is it really love at all, or something that I heard love called?”)

Don’t do that, Cohen says. Don’t reject the love as a way of creating palisade around yourself; don’t skirt the chance to inhabit the moment deeply. It’s a real moment, the waning of love, and it’s painful. Look deeply into it. Don’t stoop to avoidance, don’t succumb to the easy path and miss this moment to be conscious.

As someone long prepared for this to happen
Go firmly to the window, drink it in

I love this couplet. The phrase, “Go firmly to the window,” is lifted outright from Cavafy’s poem, and Cohen has changed Cavafy’s phrase, “and listen with deep emotion,” to “drink it in.” The “window” is the window of memory, and looking through the window is replaying the history that Alexandra and the listener have made. Go “firmly,” Cohen says — as in “strategies like this,” he implores the listener not to shrink from the challenge of confronting the view from the window, not to deny his own memory.

Exquisite music, Alexandra laughing
Your first commitments tangible again

And here is what you find at the window of memory: visions of Alexandra laughing, the memories of your first days and your first expressions of love, memories made tangible by your willingness to engage them, and to accept that life and love are not one thing or the other, pleasure or pain. They are both. Drink them both in.

And you who had the honor of her evening,
And by the honor had your own restored

“Her evening” is a metaphor for the love she shared with you. You had her love and her shared sexuality. It was an honor, she was beautiful, love personified. And by that honor, your sense of yourself as a man was restored, as it is each time a woman loves a man. It is not necessary to believe that the listener’s honor was compromised before Alexandra appeared to him — though it’s possible. Rather, the exquisite beauty of intimacy itself restores a man’s honor again and again.

Say goodbye to Alexandra leaving
Alexandra leaving with her Lord

A repeat of the chorus, and a reminder that Alexandra and Love remain the same entity. (Also a rhyme for “restored,” thank goodness!)

Even though she sleeps upon your satin
Even though she wakes you with a kiss
Do not say the moment was imagined
Do not stoop to strategies like this

A repeat of a stanza above.

As someone long prepared for the occasion
In full command of every plan you wrecked

When love departs, we yearn for explanations. Even if we knew it was coming, we become even more keenly aware of the wrongs we sowed, the anger we have directed, the petty grievances we could not relinquish. All of these constitute plans gone awry, and considered together they inherit a fullness, a logic, that soothes us, because we want to have a reason. (I am not among those who believe that “everything happens for a reason.” I think “a reason” is our feeble human attempt to make sense of things that do not make sense, and Cohen counseled repeatedly not to force things that defy reason into that realm.)

Do not choose a coward's explanation
that hides behind the cause and the effect

Looking for “a reason” is not merely a fool’s errand; it’s cowardly too. We want to pretend that love is not a mystery, that if we try hard enough, we’ll find the cause A that led to the effect B that became the cause B that led to the effect C. And voilá — we will finally understand why love departed.

Do not choose that path. You seek to understand, because it is easier than admitting you can’t. And you won’t understand — because you can’t. Love is a mystery. That is the only thing to understand.

And you who were bewildered by her meaning
Whose code was broken, crucifix uncrossed

When you wake, you’ll know again that Alexandra’s love is leaving, and that she’s lost to you. We were bewildered by what Alexandra meant — the wonder of her, the beauty, the way we loved. And now, at the end, we’ve solved the riddle — Alexandra simply meant love. Alexandra’s love and Alexandra herself are conjoined, “formlessly entwined.”

The phrase “crucifix uncrossed” vexed me at first — so obviously religious. But I don’t think it needs to be over-analyzed. On the one hand, it underscores the idea of God, in this case the “god of love.” But it’s also simply an elegant way of saying that the mystery has been identified, that the code (whether the code of love or the code of the crucifix) even when broken into its most elemental structures, still yields no “solutions” to its mysteries.

And so here at the end Cohen returns to his most basic themes, those of love and God, of beauty and sex, of women — compelling, but not solvable — and challenges us to accept that no matter how much we stoop, no matter how much we are tempted to shrink from the weight and play the coward, no matter how successfully we deconstruct the crucifix — we have no choice but to accept that there are mysteries we cannot solve, secrets of the spirit we cannot decipher, but with which we can only make peace.

Say goodbye to Alexandra leaving
Then say goodbye to Alexandra lost

Much of school is making kids just a little more stupid

My wife and I took our kids to Montgomery, Selma, and Birmingham for spring break a few weeks ago. We spent a morning at the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute and saw a field trip of well dressed kids in sixth or seventh grade, maybe 100 in all. I asked one of the docents whether it was a private or public school. She said it was public school; she was certain because there was Not. One. Single. Kid of color in the entire group. (A private school would have at least a few token nonwhite kids. A neighborhood school? Hell, friend, that's just our neighborhood. Ain't nothin' can be done 'bout that.)

Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, Montgomery, Alabama

Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, Montgomery, Alabama

And their exercise? They were on a scavenger hunt — what fun! You know why? Because running around looking for the exact date Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner were killed is way easier — for the ADULTS — than asking a bunch of white kids, "What do you think it would have been like in Birmingham in 1955 if you were black?" (Sorry, son, those three were killed on June 21, 1964. According to the answer key your silly reply that required you to think about it is wrong.)

Now, allowing him all the benefits of all the doubts, the President seems to think that the Civil War was "complicated." No. It wasn't. The Civil War was the simplest damn thing in the history of the country.

Break My Heart Sweetly, Drape Me in Blue

John Moreland

I’m still shaking my head that I didn’t know John Moreland before he opened for Shovels & Rope (below). This song, as my buddy Sarah says, has “all the feels.” A stunningly great songwriter.

I need more fingers to count the ones I love

Shovels & Rope

Cary Ann Hearst and Michael Trent, the multi-instrumentalist husband and wife otherwise known as Shovels & Rope, are perhaps guilty of overusing one of the most compelling pop chord progressions in popular music (IV-V-I-IV) to write one great tune after another. On “St. Anne’s Parade” they wait until the chorus to call on it (and they mix it up slightly with a minor instead of returning to the root) — but somehow the texture of this one is more plaintive, more raw, more weary than most of their other tunes. This is just plain good songwriting, reserved, insistent, asking listeners to draw close.

Jesus hates your High School Dances

Josh Ritter

Josh Ritter’s single from 2015, “Getting Ready to Get Down,” is a bust on those kinds of Bible colleges — no disrespect to those that are open-minded and intellectual. As usual, it’s full of tongue-in-cheek humor and the kind of twists and turns of phrase that make his lyrical adventurism so compelling. And everybody likes to figure out lyrics that whiz by so fast.

I could start fires with what I feel for you

David Ramirez

So, yeah, I'm a sucker for a sentimental song, but David Ramirez's unusually direct lyricism allows this to float on a thin breath and leaves open the question of whether it’s a song of mutual or unrequited love. Undeniably beautiful.